Page 1 of 1

Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2014 6:47 am
by daytonajim
The most recent owner of a GMMG BB has been sending me e-mails wanting the Registry to 'not disclose' that his car has been sold & re-sold a number of times in the last couple of years.



Sold in 2012, resold March of 2013 & flipped July 2013 & resold again Nov. 2014.



The history is what it is........... sold & resold, in an accident, blown motor, salvage title, repainted, upgrades or whatever.



How do you feel about not disclosing the history?



Looking for your opinion. Please let us know.



.............................



Gmmg registry,



Please I would greatly appreciated if forum

just states "bought November 2014. "

I can submit photos if you wish.



Thanks,

..................................



Please discard info on phone section and state "bought November 2014" in email section.





Thanks,

Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2014 10:36 pm
by GMMG ZL1 41
I am in agreement with you jim I think the cars history is what it is and we shouldn't hide it!

Posted: Sun Mar 01, 2015 11:18 pm
by 6LE Designs
That sounds shady as heck! Of COURSE it should be disclosed... Who would want to buy ANY car, let alone a collector car, without knowing the TRUE history (tons of "clean title" wrecked regular cars out there, wouldn't want to see this happen to these cars)?!

Posted: Mon Mar 02, 2015 1:14 am
by boggie12
Any history of the car that the owner knows should be disclosed.

Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 12:42 am
by CETABlackbird4
My two cents. Disclose the history.

Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2015 7:07 pm
by 2002Z4CSS
So what is the benefit of hiding the history? :roll: